No
Hey, Adam here. All of these Battle Axe tools were born out of me personally enjoying the process of helping other motion designers online with workflow challenges. I have enjoyed writing code snippets and sharing my opinion, but because of the increase in requests for help with AI generated code, I have to set boundaries around what I can and cannot help with. Apologies in advance for diminishing something you may have spent a lot of time working on. I just cannot help you with it.
LLMs are a really remarkable technology. They can help you quickly prototype an idea, improve personal workflows unavailable in existing software, or help you learn and internalize software development concepts with code examples.
Everyone's journey into code starts with solving their own problems and learning along the way. By hacking at a bunch of problems, you learn to think systematically and recognize patterns in how you, your team, or a client works. This helps you get better at using code to solve workflow problems. This process is a slow and annoying, but it's worth doing because you learn how to think and develop your own voice as someone who thinks in systems (that's what software development is).
Code is cheap. LLMs bring the value of code practically to zero. What's valuable in commercial software tools is not in the code, but in the developer's understanding of the problem and the opinion of their solution. A customer is not buying your code; they are buying personal freedom to outsource the understanding of the problem to you.
To shortcut your own understanding of a problem and it's solution is to cheat yourself and your customer. Whether the vibe code hallucinates and leaks customer data or works without issue is not the point.
We believe that prompting your way to a commercial product is not how you develop a deep knowledge of a system. And honestly, if you could not be bothered to invest the time into learning how your code works, why should a potential customer invest their attention or money into you?








